Cut manual regression without hiring another QA
Define critical flows, run repeatable checks for your web app, and see what broke before release.
Staging
0
0
0
You already know the problem
Regression work grows with every feature. Manual checking doesn't scale, but skipping it isn't an option.
The time problem
Every release cycle
Teams spend 2-3 days every release clicking through the same flows. It's the biggest bottleneck in the shipping process.
The risk problem
Every deploy to production
Bugs reach production because nobody had time to test everything before release. Manual coverage can't keep up with the codebase.
The cost problem
Every hiring decision
A dedicated QA hire is $100K+ and 3 months to ramp. Most teams need coverage now, not next quarter.
Sound familiar? Every growing web team hits this wall. Someone clicks through the same flows every sprint. It's slow, it's tedious, and things still slip through.
What it costs you: bugs in production, delayed releases, and a team stretched too thin to cover regression properly.
Slow releases
Manual regression adds days to every sprint
No visibility
No screenshots, no traces, no failure history
Repeated work
Same flows checked manually, every single release
Four steps to structured regression
Set up quickly with your staging URL and the flows you care about.
- 1
Add your staging URL
Point to your web app. No SDK, no code changes.
- 2
Define critical flows
Login, checkout, onboarding. The paths that matter most.
- 3
Run checks
One click. Every flow runs against your staging environment.
- 4
See what broke
Screenshots, traces, and classified failures. No guessing.
Know what broke before you ship
Every run produces real artifacts, not a green badge and a prayer.
Failures classified
Regression, flaky, or broken locator, so you know where to look first.
Screenshots at every step
See exactly what the browser saw, captured automatically.
Full execution traces
Replay the failure locally without reproducing it by hand.
Flow history across runs
Track every flow over time: stable, flaky, or newly broken.
Confirmation rendered in the baseline but missing in this build. Not a moved selector.
Your existing 
Playwright tests, running on schedule
Paste a .spec.ts file. Each test becomes a runnable flow. No rewrite, no migration.
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';
test('User login', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto(
'https://app.example.com/login');
await page.fill("input[name='email']",
'user@acme.com');
await page.fill("input[name='password']",
'secret');
await page.click("button[type='submit']");
await expect(
page.locator('.dashboard')).toBeVisible();
});
test('Create project', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto('/projects/new');
await page.fill("input#name",
'Q4 campaign');
await page.click(
"button:has-text('Create')");
await expect(
page.locator('h1')).toBeVisible();
});Skips complex patterns (loops, fixtures, helper functions) with a warning instead of a hard failure. You fix those by hand if needed.
Runs on every deploy
Wire one webhook into your pipeline. Every release triggers a full regression run, so you catch what broke before it reaches production.
curl -X POST https://regresco.com/api/webhook/trigger \
-H "x-api-key: $REGRESCO_KEY" \
-d '{"projectName":"My App"}'Copy-paste snippets for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Vercel, and bash are in your dashboard. A failed run fails the build.
Built for teams that ship fast with limited QA
If your team is doing manual regression and it's not scaling, this is for you.
A good fit if
- B2B SaaS team with 5-50 engineers
- Weekly or biweekly release cycles
- A web app with critical user-facing flows
- No dedicated QA, or QA stretched too thin
- You want release confidence, not more process
Probably not yet if
- You already have a QA team automating regression
- You need native mobile or desktop app testing
- You want zero-setup, fully autonomous testing
- You rarely ship and regressions are not a pain yet
Three ways to handle regression
Every growing team faces this choice. Here's how the options compare.
This is not magic autonomous QA. It is a practical regression workflow for web teams that need repeatable checks, visible results, and fewer manual release rituals.
Structured runs. Visible results. No black-box promises.
Simple, predictable pricing
Start with a pilot. Pay when it proves value.
Free
Run regression checks on a staging app and see if Regresco fits your workflow.
- 1 project
- 20 runs / month
- All features included
Pro
Reduce manual regression work and release with confidence.
- Up to 20 projects
- 200 runs / month
- All features included
Business
Scale regression testing without growing QA overhead.
- Up to 100 projects
- 1000 runs / month
- Priority queue
- All features included
Common questions
Do I need to change my application code?
How long does setup take?
What browsers are supported?
How is this different from Cypress or Playwright directly?
What happens when my UI changes?
Can I trigger runs from CI/CD?
Start with your highest-risk flows
Set up a pilot with your real staging app. Run checks on the flows that matter most and see what breaks before release.