Cut manual regression without hiring another QA

Define critical flows, run repeatable checks for your web app, and see what broke before release.

regresco.com/runs/cm9s4v2e00

Staging

RunRunning
Passed

0

Failed

0

Skipped

0

User login
Run Edit
1navigate/login
2fillinput[name="email"]
3fillinput[name="password"]
4clickbutton[type="submit"]
5assert.dashboard
Checkout flow
Run Edit
1navigate/cart
2click.btn-checkout
3fillinput[name="card"]
4assert[data-testid="order-confirmed"]

You already know the problem

Regression work grows with every feature. Manual checking doesn't scale, but skipping it isn't an option.

Teams spend 2-3 days every release clicking through the same flows. It's the biggest bottleneck in the shipping process.

The time problem

Every release cycle

Bugs reach production because nobody had time to test everything before release. Manual coverage can't keep up with the codebase.

The risk problem

Every deploy to production

A dedicated QA hire is $100K+ and 3 months to ramp. Most teams need coverage now, not next quarter.

The cost problem

Every hiring decision

Sound familiar? Every growing web team hits this wall. Someone clicks through the same flows every sprint. It's slow, it's tedious, and things still slip through.

What it costs you: bugs in production, delayed releases, and a team stretched too thin to cover regression properly.

Slow releases

Manual regression adds days to every sprint

No visibility

No screenshots, no traces, no failure history

Repeated work

Same flows checked manually, every single release

How it works

Four steps to structured regression

Set up quickly with your staging URL and the flows you care about.

01

Add your staging URL

Point to your web app. No SDK, no code changes.

02

Define critical flows

Login, checkout, onboarding. The paths that matter most.

03

Run checks

One click. Every flow runs against your staging environment.

04

See what broke

Screenshots, traces, and classified failures. No guessing.

Results

Know what broke before you ship

Every run produces real artifacts, not a green badge and a prayer.

Screenshots at every step

See exactly what the browser saw. Every action, every page, captured automatically.

Full execution traces

Playwright traces you can replay locally. Find the issue without reproducing it manually.

Classified failures

Each failure is labeled: likely regression, broken locator, or flaky. Know where to focus first.

Flow history across runs

Track every flow over time. See what's stable, what's flaky, and what just broke.

Playwright import

Your existing Playwright Playwright tests, running on schedule

Paste a .spec.ts file. Each test becomes a runnable flow. No rewrite, no migration.

user-flows.spec.ts
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';

test('User login', async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto(
    'https://app.example.com/login');
  await page.fill("input[name='email']",
    'user@acme.com');
  await page.fill("input[name='password']",
    'secret');
  await page.click("button[type='submit']");
  await expect(
    page.locator('.dashboard')).toBeVisible();
});

test('Create project', async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto('/projects/new');
  await page.fill("input#name",
    'Q4 campaign');
  await page.click(
    "button:has-text('Create')");
  await expect(
    page.locator('h1')).toBeVisible();
});
Parsed as 2 flows · ready to run
User login5 steps
1navigatehttps://app.example.com/login
2fillinput[name='email']
3fillinput[name='password']
4clickbutton[type='submit']
5assert.dashboard
Create project4 steps
1navigate/projects/new
2fillinput#name
3clickbutton:has-text("Create")
4asserth1

Skips complex patterns (loops, fixtures, helper functions) with a warning instead of a hard failure. You fix those by hand if needed.

Who it's for

Built for teams that ship fast with limited QA

If your team is doing manual regression and it's not scaling, this is for you.

B2B SaaS teams with 5-50 engineers
Weekly or biweekly release cycles
Web apps with critical user-facing flows
No dedicated QA team, or QA stretched too thin
Manual regression that keeps growing with the product
Engineering leads who want release confidence, not more process
Compare

Three ways to handle regression

Every growing team faces this choice. Here's how the options compare.

Keep doing it manually
Familiar, but doesn't scale
Eats engineering time every release
Coverage gaps grow with the product
No artifacts, no history, no visibility
Add QA headcount
$80-120K/year fully loaded
2-3 months to hire and ramp up
Helps, but still largely manual
Right move eventually, but maybe not yet
Structured regression automation
Running in days, not months
Covers every defined flow, every run
Screenshots, traces, and failure visibility
Complements your team, doesn't replace it

“This is not magic autonomous QA. It is a practical regression workflow for web teams that need repeatable checks, visible results, and fewer manual release rituals.”

Structured runs. Visible results. No black-box promises.

Pricing

Simple, predictable pricing

Start with a pilot. Pay when it proves value.

Free

Try it on your real staging app

$0
  • 1 project
  • 5 runs / month
  • All features included
Start free
Recommended

Pro

Ship with confidence every release

$49/month
  • 20 projects
  • 200 runs / month
  • All features included
Get started

Business

For teams releasing daily

$149/month
  • 100 projects
  • 1000 runs / month
  • Priority queue
  • All features included
Start with Business
FAQ

Common questions

Do I need to change my application code?
No. You just provide your staging URL. Tests run in a real browser against your app. No SDK, no snippets, no code changes. If your app requires login, you can add an API step to authenticate within the flow.
How long does setup take?
About 15 minutes. Add a project, describe what to test in plain text or generate flows by crawling your site, and hit Run.
What browsers are supported?
Tests run on Chromium via Playwright. Firefox and WebKit support is on the roadmap.
How is this different from Cypress or Playwright directly?
You don't write or maintain test code. Describe what to test in plain text, or the platform crawls your site and generates flows. It runs tests, classifies failures, detects flaky patterns, and explains errors and suggests fixes. Regression coverage without the maintenance burden.
What happens when my UI changes?
Failures are classified automatically: broken locator, likely regression, or flaky. Each failure includes an explanation of what went wrong and a suggested fix. You'll know whether something actually broke or just moved.
Can I trigger runs from CI/CD?
Yes. Every user gets an API key for webhook integration. Trigger a full regression run on every deploy to staging.

Start with your highest-risk flows

Set up a pilot with your real staging app. Run checks on the flows that matter most and see what breaks before release.